Tuesday 13 March 2018

When indigenous becomes ingenuine: the effects of tourism on Sami culture


Have you ever traveled further than 50 miles from your home? Well, then you are most likely a cultural tourist. Do arts and culture influence how you choose your travel destination? Then you are taking part in a tourism industry that has seen significant growth in recent years. Richard Prentice defines this new form of tourism as “constructed, proffered and consumed explicitly or implicitly as cultural appreciation, either as experiences or schematic knowledge gaining” (Prentice 2001). In this post we will explore the experiential side of cultural tourism, investigating the case of the Sami in Scandinavia, whose culture has been featured in various (open air) museums. Open air museums have a long tradition in Scandinavia, providing the visitor with a rather unique experience. The museum becomes a place of ‘attaining the real’ (Prentice 2001). But how authentic is this what is sold to us as ‘real’?  Is authenticity possible in a museum setting, or does the very act of abstraction and interpretation make authentic representation of a minority culture impossible? And what socioeconomic impact does the commodification and (mis)representation of an ethnolinguistic minority such as the Sami have not only on their identity and cultural self-esteem? We will explore these questions in the following paragraphs.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/duffeli/580181717

The indigenous Sami culture is seen as an asset for developing a tourism industry as it diversified the Sami economy and generated new sources of income. The SSA (Swedish Sami Association) has promoted and supported Sami tourism, through the aims to develop and aid the Sami to profit from it. Due to the Samis’ economic boom, the communities are fronting development and globalization, meaning the traditions and modern livelihood are coexistent. For instance herding, fishing, and hunting are not the main source of income for the Samis, however, they play an important role in Sami communities. As Prentice (2001) notes, a modern aspect of tourism is the inclusion of cultural empathy; to provide the visitor with a truly authentic and spiritual experience. Experiential tourism, as Prentice calls it, is becoming a significant way of tourism; culture is to be explored and found instead of readily presented in order to offer the most authentic cultural experience to the visitor (Prentice 2001). But how to represent an indigenous minority culture, such as the one of the Sami, as truthfully as possible? Can a culture be explored and not exploited?

Sami culture has over time been commodified and marketed as a tourist destination; as a souvenir industry, for decoration, costumes and tourist products. Indigenous tourism has been seen as an opportunity for the Sami communities and their economy, however, it was also seen as a threat to their culture and traditions. As a result of the booming tourist industry, non-Sami tourist entrepreneurs have been innovative in using Sami culture in marketing and tourism business. In this setting, Sami culture is not always truthfully represented, but shaped as a product that is more aligned with tourists’ imagination and expectations, and is in danger of losing authenticity.

Museums often display Sami culture as well, for instance; the open-air Norsk Folkemuseum in Oslo has received financial support from UNESCO in order to set up a site where immaterial Sami cultural heritage is displayed. There will be staff manning the site, who will give a  verbal presentation as well as demonstrate various activities such as preparing food and traditional clothing (norskfolkemuseum.no) However, this exposition does not have to be specifically manned by people from Sami heritage. With a non-Sami person representing Sami culture, the danger of misrepresentation is imminent. Cultural representation in museums does not necessarily have to be inauthentic. Museums can display cultures in a correct and appreciative manner, but in order to do so, people from the represented culture should be present and in charge of the exposition in order to prevent misinterpretation, and as a result, misrepresentation.

Nowadays, Sami tourism is considered as ‘Culture Disposed’ of tourism meaning, Sami culture has been taken advantage of by the non-Sami entrepreneurs leaving the Samis without profit. The demand and interest for the authenticity of cultural tourism with indigenous presence is slowly growing, making it likely to re-evaluate the commodification of the tourism industry. Maybe this re-evaluation and desire for authentic representation of Sami culture could spark an interest in Sami people to partake in representing their traditional ways authentically. This resurgence could reinstate and solidify a genuine Sami culture and boost their cultural self-esteem. There are many opportunities to shift the tourism industry towards a direction that supports living possibilities in the Sami provinces and promotes the Sami culture to flourish (Aikio, 2014).


Food for thought: Is it possible to provide experiential tourism without commodifying the culture in question? Can you think of a successful attempt?

Written by Jesse, Marie, Saru and Sandra



References


Aikio, E. (2014). Chapter 4.4 Tourism development in Saami communities in Finland. Septentrio Conference Series, (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/5.3211


Interpretation of Sami Culture. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2018, from https://norskfolkemuseum.no/en/unesco-supports-project-in-the-openair-museum

Prentice, Richard. “Experiential Cultural Tourism: Museums & the Marketing of the New Romanticism of Evoked Authenticity.” Museum Management and Curatorship 19, no. 1 (2001): 5-26

8 comments:

  1. Thank you for your article, personally I do not think it is possible to provide experiential tourism without commodifying the culture to some extent for the majority of the tourist. As they are looking for the 'full'experience in a short period of time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice post! I like your choice of words for the title as it immediately cuts to the chase. Your introduction starts out nicely by addressing the reader and smoothly connects this to the literature and the particular case of the Sami. With regard to your question posed at the end I would say that in theory it should be possible to give an authentic experience of a certain culture (with authentic meaning: based on the essence as held by its own people) as tourists should just be able to observe a particular culture from a distance. In practice, I think it is hard to do this, because as soon as you let an audience in, the experience will most likely change. That is, the experience is facilitated to the audience in order to make it tangible. So, even when a culture seems authentic it can be distorted by its commodification. I do not think this is necessarily bad, as long as it is not at the expense of the culture or its people. So, I definetely agree that people from the represented culture should be in charge of the exposition of their culture.

    JG

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your blogpost! Would you see the case of displaying the Sami culture in open air museums and the misrepresentation by non-Sami people as cultural appropriation? Are there known cases of Sami people commenting on their culture being displayed, as you said the SSA (Swedish Sami Association) has promoted and supported the tourism? In my opinion this sounds a bit contradictory.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very nice blog post! I think you did a great job of using the example of the Sami culture to explain and answer the questions you started the blog post with. I believe it is impossible to provide experiential tourism without commodifying the culture, and therefore impossible for tourists to have an authentic experience of a certain culture.

    WvdV

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting case! I think it is not really possible to have provide an authentic experience of a certain culture for tourist, because if you really want to have an authentic experience of a culture you should integrate into it. It's impossible to get a legitimate view of a culture within one day or week. Also, the culture should be the one to display their own culture, because it's their story and not someone else's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think it is a bit troublesome that the recent move towards 'experiencing' a culture has the effect you have written about in the case of the Sami. I think that, for the sake of financial gain and making the activity interesting for tourists to experience, there has to be some commodification and marketing. To me, this is a bad thing.

    MMK

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice Blogpost! The subject you chose fits the theme of the week very nicely. As the comments above, I also think that it is impossible to give tourists a fully authentic experience of the Sami culture. There is always commodification of the culture when you expose it to tourism and mostly that is not in favor of the culture which is exposed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for writing the blog! I guess seeing the quite horrific things that happend to the Sami people throughout quite a large part of history, the point you make about 'culture disposed 'does sadly not surprise me much... Some would've probably hoped that the Sami could get some economic gain through tourism, but I would guess we should be very careful with this. Since like you mention it can have negative effects. Another example comes to mind (not answering your question, but more the opposite): the tourism at Native American reservations. It seems to have detrimental effects on native americans that they have been drawn into the 'modern world' through earning money with tourism.. Let's hope this shift towards a flourishing Sami culture like you mention at the end happens!

    EMvG

    ReplyDelete